Distinctions that Make a Difference: Dogma and Doxa

The distinction between dogma and doxa (Gk. “opinion”) is widespread in philosophical and theological works, but Bavinck’s Reformed Dogmatics, Vol. 1, provides a nice, terse definition of it. Bavinck writes, “Etymologically and historically there has always been a sharp distinction between δογμα and δοξα, between a doctrine based on a given authority and authoritative for a specific circle and in a specific area on the one hand, and the private opinion of a person, however renowned, on the other.”

This is a useful distinction to keep in mind precisely because of the theological climate in which we live. We live at a time in the Church’s history when, practically speaking, religious demagogues, spiritual gurus, and TV preachers have more authority than do church confessions of faith. Very easily, the opinions of well-respected, godly men gain near canonical authority over the beliefs of Christians, while church confessional documents fall by the wayside. It is worth remembering that though this is the case, it is a tragic example of how private opinion has gain a disturbing amount of authority in the Church.


2 comments on “Distinctions that Make a Difference: Dogma and Doxa

  1. Apostle peter says:

    Doxa dogma is sure a theological jagon
    And does really have key distinction in use and application

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s