“Theology doesn’t just think; it walks, weeps, and bleeds.” -Russell Moore, preface to The Gospel for Life series
- God understands why I don’t obey in this.
- I’ll do a little, but not all.
- I’ll do this, if God gives me that.
- I won’t do this thing which God wants, but I’ll do that other thing he wants extra hard to make up for it.
“When doctrine fails to relate to life, it becomes an argument against the truth of Christianity.” -Kevin Vanhoozer
I was thinking today about how theological slogans can become abused to the point of becoming untrue. Today, I was thinking about the criticism that the mere preaching/teaching of the ethical sections of Scripture automatically means making Christianity “about us.”
In the broader history of Reformed theology that viewpoint is called antinomianism, and has never actually been countenanced in the Reformed confessions and catechisms.
But it did get me thinking about what needs to be present in a sermon or lecture to avoid a legitimate charge of making Christianity “about us.” Here’s me taking a stab at it:
- The lecture/sermon needs to connect the ethical teaching to the Gospel, wherein the Gospel is shown to be the source of strength that enables us to obey the ethic.
- The ethic should not be preached/taught as a way of securing salvation before God.
- More subtly, when our hang-ups about making Christianity “about us” lead us to the place where we won’t let God in his word address us about ethical questions that he wants to talk to us about, we actually have made Christianity about us. Why? Because that means God’s revelation speaks to an issue, but we are forbidding that teaching to be given because of an irrational fear in our hearts. In that moment, the fear (about Christianity being “about us”) has become the real God in our heart, and the true God has been forced to be its servant.